Legislative committee or regional assembly
International Northern Union Forum
By this do you mean that the responsibility of proposing and passing laws are given to the INUCA and that the SC has veto power?the INUCA will assume the ability to make new laws (this authority will be removed from the Supreme Council, replaced by veto/pass authority for legislature laws).
With how much of a majority? If it's the same as passing the law, the veto is essentially worthless.The INUCA will also be able to override a veto that is made by the Supreme Council.
This is by far my biggest issue. The ability of the INUCA to expel any official from office is open to flagrant power abuse, and democratically elected candidates should not be forced to step down because of political disagreements. The only way to expel an official should be through referendum.If there is an official whom the INUCA feels is corrupt or power-abusive, the INUCA will have the authority to expel the official from office.
Wouldn't this be put into the passing laws category? Pass legislature to amend the constitution, i mean.Lastly, if we put together a regional constitution, the INUCA should have the ability to amend it.
I see, that's fine then. I agree with that.First, you are correct; passing laws will move to the INUCA and veto power will move to the SC.
I agree that the INUCA should be able to reverse veto's, we can discuss the required majority later.Second, the majority numbers are to be determined in the next step. This way we don't have a cloud of disagreements about the majority numbers along with the basic plans. Right now, we're just trying to outline exactly what the INUCA will do. (I don't wish for this to be discussed until we reach the next step, but I say probably a 2/3 to 5/6 majority to override a veto. It has to be high.)
While i appreciate giving the INUCA things to do, i still think giving them the power to strip officials is a very bad idea, there's far too much that could go wrong with that. (Difference of Opinion, Shuttering, etc.)Third, I intended for an extremely high majority to determine this in the INUCA, and since the INUCA is both democratic and will represent multiple opinions, it would be virtually impossible for power abuse to occur. However, if you feel that duty should be strictly for referenda, then I will not disagree with you; I was simply trying to find enough duties for the INUCA to keep it busy.
Fair Enough.Fourth, to an extent, yes. Some amendments would be more along the line of repealing or simply editing something, though, whereas laws are generally additions. If we combine the two, though, I would recommend they be listed as amendments rather than laws so that the duty encompasses all of those.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
International Northern Union Forum » Political and Government Center » INU Government » INU Regional Legislature
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum